Niche-aware discovery: how the search queries get written

Keyword tools find the pages everyone else has already pitched. Query planning is the difference between prospecting your category and prospecting your market.

5 min read

The short version

  • Dice builds a market profile from your own site first — core category, problem terms, adjacent topics, product terms, and audience terms — then writes queries from it.
  • Four query strategies run in parallel: category, blog and resource, competitor, and long-tail. Each reaches a different kind of page.
  • Competitor queries are how you find pages that list your rivals and omit you. You confirm the competitor list before anything is searched.
  • Every candidate keeps the queries that found it, the strategy each query belonged to, and its rank in those results. That evidence later becomes part of its score.
  • Being found by several distinct queries across several strategies is a real signal, and it is scored as one.

Ask ten people to find link opportunities for a project management tool and you will get ten versions of the same search: “best project management software.” The results are the same twenty articles, every one of them pitched weekly by every competitor in the category, most of them run by publishers with a rate card rather than an editor.

The opportunities worth having are usually one step sideways from the obvious keyword. Query planning is how discovery gets there deliberately rather than by luck.

It starts with your own site, not a keyword

Before any search runs, Dice reads your website and builds a profile of the market you actually operate in. That profile is deliberately structured into five different vocabularies, because they behave differently in search:

VocabularyWhat it capturesWhat it finds
Core categoryWhat the product is, in the words the industry usesCategory roundups, “best of” lists, directories
Problem termsThe pain the product removes, phrased as a reader wouldHow-to guides, troubleshooting articles, opinion pieces
Adjacent topicsNeighbouring subjects you legitimately belong toBroader guides where you are one relevant tool among several
Product termsFeatures, integrations, and technical specificsComparison pages, technical writeups, integration lists
Audience termsWho the reader is and what they call themselvesCommunity blogs, niche publications, role-specific resources
The five vocabularies in a market profile, and what each one reaches.

A single keyword collapses all five into one. Keeping them separate is what lets discovery reach an article about a workflow problem that never names your category once, and is nonetheless exactly the kind of page your product belongs in.

Four query strategies

The profile is expanded into concrete search queries, and each query is tagged with the strategy it came from. The tag is not cosmetic — it follows the candidate through the entire pipeline.

  1. 01

    Category queries

    The direct route: pages about your category, its leading tools, and the choices buyers make within it. These find the obvious roundups. They should be searched — they just should not be all you search.

  2. 02

    Blog and resource queries

    Pages that exist to collect useful things: resource lists, curated guides, tool directories, “further reading” sections. These are structurally receptive to an addition, because listing things is what they are for.

  3. 03

    Competitor queries

    Pages that name your competitors. This is the strategy that finds the article listing four alternatives to a rival where you are conspicuously missing. You confirm the competitor list first, so the search reflects your real market rather than a guess.

  4. 04

    Long-tail queries

    Specific, low-volume phrasings drawn from the problem and audience vocabularies. These reach independent blogs and small publications that keyword-volume tools rank as worthless and editors answer personally.

What gets thrown away immediately

Search results arrive with a lot of noise attached. Before anything is scored, candidates are normalized and filtered on cheap, unambiguous rules:

  • Your own domain, which cannot link to you
  • Blocked domains
  • File downloads rather than pages
  • Account, login, and other utility pages
  • Search result pages, which are not editorial content
  • E-commerce product listings
  • Results that are clearly irrelevant to the profile

URLs are also normalized before deduplication, so the same article arriving from three queries with three different tracking parameters becomes one candidate with three pieces of evidence — not three candidates competing with each other.

Evidence is the point

Every surviving candidate carries a record of how it was found: each query that surfaced it, the strategy that query belonged to, its rank in those results, and the competitor seed if a competitor query found it.

That record is used, not merely stored. When enrichment decides which candidates are worth the expense of reading, discovery evidence is a direct input: a page found by several distinct queries earns a bonus, a page found across several different strategies earns another, a page found by a competitor query earns another, and a page that ranked in the top few results earns another still. Converging evidence is a genuinely better signal than a single strong hit, and scoring it explicitly is how that belief becomes reproducible instead of intuitive.

A page found by one query at position 40 and a page found by four queries across three strategies are not the same candidate, and should not be treated as one.

Finding opportunities for Acme

Live pipeline · updates automatically

01Discovery

150 results · 109 candidates

02Enrichment

82 pages read · 61 ready

03Qualification

47 opportunities selected

04Contact discovery

31 websites checked · 54 emails

Selected opportunities

Ranked with evidence

View all 47
96

Best AI visibility tools in 2026

growthnerd.io · competitor gap

91

Top link-building platforms for SaaS

saasframe.io · competitor gap

86

AI search optimization software

marketerstack.com · competitor gap

A faithful preview of the Dice workspace · illustrative data

Discovery reports how many raw results it collected and how many survived as candidates. The gap between the two numbers is the filtering you did not have to do by hand.

Why smaller publishers are a feature

Long-tail and audience-term queries surface a lot of small sites: one-person blogs, company blogs at ten-person startups, niche newsletters, community resource pages. It is tempting to filter them out on traffic.

Dice does not, because reachability and relevance both run the other way. The independent blogger writing carefully about your exact problem reads their own email, has no rate card, and links because your product is genuinely useful to their reader. The metric-heavy publication has a submissions form and a media kit. Popularity alone is not treated as quality — publisher intelligence classifies the site so you can make that call with the facts in front of you.

What happens to a candidate after discovery — which ones get read, and what reading them produces — is covered in what page enrichment extracts.

Frequently asked questions

Keep reading

All posts

Find the pages your company should already be on.

Start with the 14-day paid discovery run. $11.99 once, and it never auto-renews.

Find my opportunities